Adaptive bars in use
The first random test to compare strategy using second generation adaptive bar versus normal bar.
I just choose my PVAutoTrendLinesS as it is a simple and most used one among my customers. (no idea if the best one, probably not) and used the default values used there (those default values are back to 08/2018 so NOT backtested or fitted at all as I just use data from starting 01/2021 up today (2022/09/07), so much better results can be seen with optimizer!)
Anyway, results with simple backtest, default parameters.
Normal Minute bars, 15 min, 1 contract NQ, PF 1.22
And same with VRT_Minute 15,same settings. PF 1.37
No idea if I would use that this way, but just test it yourself and optimize better values. Free test time available for both.
Example of optimized results just to get idea what to optimize, but be free to test if interested. Click picture to enlarge it, there might be some good candidates (probably not this PF 4.14 but some next ones (even next one! 3.84 with double profit and use higher target/stop loss settings with NQ) at list as Profit Factor was "Optimize on" here, use "Max Strength", my favorite)
No comments:
Post a Comment